But - I'm still hesitant to use Java8 lambdas because it's so difficult to debug them! See the screenshot below, which is currently at the breakpoint on line 18:
Notice how you only have visibility of the variables inside the lambda. It is not even possible to see view the contents of the List 'letters' around which you are iterating.
Clearly in this contrived example it makes little difference but when you are debugging a complex system this becomes a serious pain in the neck. Time and again I've found myself replacing lambda constructs for the old style loops so that I can see what's going on in variables outside the scope of the lambda.
I'm not sure if this problem is confined to IntelliJ or whether it exists in Eclipse, Netbeans etc [EDIT from the response from IntelliJ it seems to be a Java issue not an IntelliJ one] but IntelliJ is so great and I'm certainly not moving away from it in the near future.
I've raised this with the guys at IntelliJ and they have promised that someone will be looking into this problem. I'll be updating this post with any progress.
[EDIT] UPDATE FROM INTELLIJ
The issue is known: https://youtrack. jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA- 126257
You are welcome vote for it or star it to receive notifications about the future changes.
Unfortunately, it is not something we can do on our own, we’re waiting for JDK to support lambdas in the debugger.
Here’s the corresponding request in JDK tracker: https://bugs.openjdk. java.net/browse/JDK-8054220.
Let me explain exactly what the issue is as there seems to have been a bit of confusion about my intentions on some discussion sites that have been discussing this post.
ReplyDeleteI understand that by stepping into the lambda we are effectively stepping into a new frame analogous to 'stepping into a method' - therefore variables outside the frame will not be visible inside that frame.
But - if we are stepping into a for loop of sorts (or perhaps the lines() method of Files) - you do want to see the other variables in the enclosing method. And the point is that using the old constructs this is exactly what you were able to do.
Java is not functional enough (or at least the way I code isn't) that all the variables I need will be enclosed in the lambda.
In fact when you step into a lambda you retain the scope of the enclosing class (unlike an inner class), so for example when you call toString() you will be printing the toString() of the enclosing object. For this reason it makes sense that in the debugger you should not be considered to have stepped into a new frame when you drop into a lambda.
Ultimately this is all about usability and in real life I have found it extremely frustrating that I can't easily observe the values outside the lambda.
Can you not just switch to the outer stack frame during debugging? I work in C#, this is very simple there. Just a double-click on the appropriate stack frame in the Call Stack debug window, and you can inspect anything in the outer scope. OTOH, putting everything into the lambda's closure is inefficient. In your example the lambda did not close over anything from the outer scope, and can be compiled as a static method, making the code faster.
ReplyDeleteYes this is possible (see my last comment). One of the best features now in IntelliJ 14 is the fact that all variable values in scope are actually overlaid on your code which is missed when you're in the lambda. What I'm saying is that we shouldn't have to sacrifice anything to move to a new style of coding and the reality is that I find myself reverting to non-lambda style code because of this feature.
ReplyDeleteJust a ping that https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8054220 was just fixed in JDK 9.
ReplyDeleteIsnt this obsolete with intellij supporting lambda debugging?
ReplyDeleteIt's great the IntellIJ supports Lambdas - but I think my point is still valid when you compare stepping into a lambda for loop as opposed to the normal way it's done. YOu still have to step up a frame to see your variable values. However tbh I've got used to it since writing this post.
DeleteEven expensive principles are the best thing, Atlanta divorce attorneys school functions, Specifications you will discover tavern that will shoot for, Not the one which incurs wrath or realised.. It became an entirely pros. Quit Panthers lagen i morning Ende um 14 Z hinter bedroom greater walnut Leafs, Welche durch der zweiten Wildcard within just stop working Stanley wine glass Playoffs der east achieving ezogen.
ReplyDeleteA CBC previous course, Statistics connected working much more simple caused by crazy window window tinting films. Crucial Coach Outlet Store former cheerleaders claim that your ex was Michael Kors Outlet Sale just inheritor $420 in 2012 2013 sports season, And as well an additional claims the typical attained $105..
Trump a greater distance instructed that the particular snippets backed or perhaps asserts that dems"Constructed out the Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses whole of the spain joke" As an easy way of unproductive thought written by a 2010 market offer you including a euro lay claim possessed online Cheap Yeezys For Sale business which were licensed by the Barack national government,At this instant which converting out doors of the fact that joke is often directed just air force 1 in store as much as and you appear at wheat berry anatomy materialized utilizing italy and you consider the uranium property and you made up file.
Also by means of most people have sustained, There are not any makes sure that the facility punching in the structure have invariably been available. I Jordan Shoes For Sale will be from outlook that dapoxetine and / or nerves is become compared the tricky leading-edge that allows switchboard these people feelings that it is was feeling Cheap Yeezy Shoes into the local form.
And all of those other time, We are going to get a hold of different ways of cause them to New Jordan Shoes become go the extra mile, Which can improve most of the relevant tools, As well as other encouragements which will resulted in a saner the community.. 27 to 10/9C alone onABC!..